In this article we are going to build on the previous articles by exploring a societal model that may combines insights from experiments around the world and consider how we might journey toward this societal model.

We need a framework for thinking about how the implications of AI combine into whole systems; to identify system archetypes, which are essentially different combinations of economic model, governance model, and information environment that could emerge as AI transforms society.

We’ve trapped our politicians in the attention economy and are now asking why they focus on emotive slogans rather than analysing solutions to our collective problems. This is leading to many innovators asking: can we make democracy more open, participatory, and deliberative using new tools?

What happens when a new force, artificial intelligence, starts to corrode the pillars Liberalism? In this article we look at some of the new economic models that may emerge.

IQ does reliably predict high school exam performance, but its ability to forecast anything more meaningful, like sustained career success, wealth creation, or economic contribution, is far weaker than most people assume.

The central question is this: If our universe is governed by a formal system that is internally consistent, are we limiting AI’s potential by training it exclusively on data derived from one formal reality?

Artificial Intelligence isn’t just accelerating existing workflows – it may also rebuild the very architecture of corporate organisations.

What ethicsl would we expect AI to spontaneously develop? This is a muse on why AI will almost inevitably develop its own version of ethics, and how those ethics may evolve.

Decentralised personal data and AI can unlock new types of market which power the creation of social value.

How the emergence of decentralise data and AI will restructure consumer markets and redefine corporate strategies.